Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent condition that affects nearly half of all women, yet it often goes undiagnosed until symptoms become severe, leading to delays in care and treatment. Despite the availability of both surgical and non-surgical treatment options, research is limited regarding the progression of POP symptoms, patient satisfaction with various treatments, and the efficacy of non-surgical approaches. This study was conducted to evaluate symptom progression from onset to diagnosis and assess patient satisfaction to uncover which treatment modalities offer the most symptom relief, particularly for persistent symptoms like pelvic pain and urinary retention.
To investigate this, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among 158 women with a confirmed POP diagnosis. The survey, distributed via a support group, gathered data on symptom severity at onset, at diagnosis, and post-treatment, as well as patient satisfaction with both surgical and non-surgical interventions. Data was also collected on the time it took for patients to seek care, and demographic factors like age, number of pregnancies, and method of delivery were analyzed. Symptom severity was compared across different treatment modalities to identify trends in symptom resolution.
Our findings indicate that surgical treatments, particularly posterior rectum repair and anterior bladder repair, resulted in significantly greater symptom improvement and higher patient satisfaction than non-surgical treatments such as pessary use and physical therapy. Symptoms such as the feeling of a vaginal bulge and back pain showed marked improvement, while dyspareunia and pelvic pain remained persistent. These results highlight the critical need for early diagnosis and intervention, as well as the importance of more individualized treatment strategies. Addressing the gaps in symptom management could lead to better outcomes for POP patients, especially for those experiencing symptoms that are not adequately resolved through standard treatments.
Obstructive sleep apnea is a condition where the upper airway becomes blocked during sleep, causing breathing interruptions. Recent studies suggest that tongue thickness might help diagnose obstructive sleep apnea because reduced muscle tone (as evidenced by increased tongue thickness) can contribute to airway blockage during sleep. Tongue thickness can be measured non-invasively using bedside ultrasound.
This review examines 20 peer-reviewed articles published between 2019 and 2024 utilizing various methods for measuring tongue thickness, including descriptions of: ultrasound probe frequency, patient positioning, probe placement, and anatomical landmarks. Although patient positioning and anatomical landmarks showed some similarities between studies, variability in tongue positioning and probe placement were more common. Only 5 of the 20 studies reported intra- and interrater reliability statistics were in the range of: 0.76-0.98 and 0.92-0.95 respectively.
A standardized, reliable, and reproducible protocol for measuring tongue thickness is still needed to establish a foundation for the increasing ways in which tongue thickness measurements are being incorporated into bedside research as a potential clinical diagnostic tool.
Library Home | RVU Home | Campus Directory | iNet
|