Lorlatinib Induced Cardiomyopathy in the Treatment of NSCLCDetails
Title: Lorlatinib Induced Cardiomyopathy in the Treatment of NSCLC
Contributor: Myers, Tristan, OMS III, Feustel, Kavanya, MD, and Torgerson, Lesli, MD
Date Created: 3/2/2024
Review Status: Peer Reviewed
Presented At: American College of Physicians Annual Meeting
Presented: 2024
Subject Keywords: tyrosine kinase inhibitor, lung cancer, palliative care, palliative chemotherapy, non-ischemic heart failure
Genre/Format: Posters
Language: English
Standard Rights Statement: CC-BY, Non-exclusive rights granted to Rocky Vista University for distribution.
Abstract Lorlatinib, a relatively new anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is ALK-positive (1). Lorlatinib in particular has been recognized for its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, making it desirable for patients with metastatic disease of the brain. Among the adverse effects listed by the manufacturer for lorlatinib, the only cardiac event is atrioventricular (AV) block at a rate of 1.9% of patients, with 0.2% developing grade 3 AV block requiring a pacemaker (2). Cardiomyopathy resulting in heart failure secondary to lorlatinib would therefore demonstrate a rare adverse event associated with ALK inhibitors.
A 63 yo male with a complicated past medical history including recurrent stage IV adenocarcinoma of the lung undergoing palliative chemotherapy, with secondary/paraneoplastic dermatomyositis, insulin-managed type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and Barrett's esophagus presented to the emergency department (ED) with a complaint of worsening shortness of breath and rapid acute respiratory failure that required intubation. History revealed the patient had been experiencing dyspnea since beginning 50 mg daily of lorlatinib as palliative chemotherapy the month prior. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest demonstrated likely acute pulmonary embolism with large right pleural effusion. Thoracentesis was performed and the patient was intubated and admitted to the ICU. Lab results were concerning for acute kidney injury and hepatic shock, however these improved with fluids and vasopressor support. TTE was performed and the findings were concerning for acute systolic heart failure that cardiology consultation believed to be either stress induced or related to chemotherapy. The patient was tapered off of inotropes and diuresed with IV Lasix, but there was no recovery of LVEF. Ischemic evaluation was performed with a nuclear perfusion stress test. Results of the stress test showed a moderate-sized mild severity partially fixed, partially reversible inferior and inferoapical defect that could be consistent with stress-induced ischemia. The LVEF was measured at 17% with a severely dilated left ventricle. Consultation with cardiology found these findings to be more consistent with nonischemic cardiomyopathy possibly secondary to immunotherapy with lorlatinib. The patient was discharged with a wearable cardioverter defibrillator due to LVEF remaining below 30%.
There is scant documentation in the literature regarding lorlatinib induced cardiomyopathy, but it has been recognized that lorlatinib induced cardiomyopathy is not included in FDA package inserts and may represent a new adverse event (3). From 2016 to 2021, there have been 605 cases of cardiotoxicity associated with all ALK inhibitors when data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) were analyzed in a pharmacovigilance analysis (3). These findings highlight the importance of vigilance and understanding of cardiotoxicity associated with ALK inhibitors. Further documentation of similar cases will illustrate the scope of cardiomyopathy associated with lorlatinib. Understanding of serious adverse events associated with ALK inhibitor like lorlatinib will help shape the risk-benefit analysis when choosing appropriate therapy for ALK positive NSCLC.